Prediction of Evan Song vs Ji Sung Nam Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Song vs J. Sung Nam

Evan Song
USA
w
w
l
l
l
w
l
w
l
l
0
Win
1
Played
1
Win
33
Age
32
5'10" (178 cm)
Height
6'0" (183 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
716
314
Best Rank
236
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$7.1K
Career Money
$1.4K
Left-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Ji Sung Nam
KOR
w
l
w
w
l
w
w
l
w
l
0
Win
1
Played
1
Win
33
Age
32
5'10" (178 cm)
Height
6'0" (183 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
716
314
Best Rank
236
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$7.1K
Career Money
$1.4K
Left-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Song 0 - 1 Nam
They have played 2 sets in total, with Evan Song winning 0 and Ji Sung Nam winning 2. The last match between Ji Sung Nam and Evan Song was at the Drummondville Challenger, 19-02-2020, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Ji Sung Nam getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Song | 0 |
| Nam | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Drummondville Challenger(02-19-20)
Ji Sung Nam
6
6
Evan Song
2
1
E. Song vs J. S. Nam H2H Profile
E. Song vs J. S. Nam Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Evan Song has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Ji Sung Nam has won 42.30%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Evan Song, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ji Sung Nam has won 47.28%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 27.00% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Evan Song has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ji Sung Nam has saved 53.96% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Evan Song has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Ji Sung Nam winning 58.97% (W/L 23/16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Evan Song has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 19/16), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 31% (W/L 11/24). Ji Sung Nam has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 257/187), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/2).
- Player level: In the last year, Evan Song has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Ji Sung Nam has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.57% of matches (W/L 16/7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Evan Song winning 0 times and Ji Sung Nam being victorious 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Evan Song winning 0 and Ji Sung Nam winning 2.
- The last match between Evan Song and Ji Sung Nam was at the Drummondville Challenger, 19-02-2020, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Ji Sung Nam getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:56:12.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Evan Song has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Ji Sung Nam has played against players with an average rank of 375.79.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Evan Song has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ji Sung Nam has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Evan Song has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ji Sung Nam has converted 39.62% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Evan Song vs Ji Sung Nam Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Song vs J. S. Nam H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 3 | Games Won | 12 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:56:12 | Average Match Time | 0:56:12 |
| 55% (28/51) | 1st Serve % | 52% (22/42) |
| 50% (14/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 86% (19/22) |
| 43% (10/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (11/20) |
| 0% (0/1) | Break Pts Won % | 71% (5/7) |
| 29% (12/42) | Return Points Win % | 53% (27/51) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Song 0%, Nam 50%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Song 0%, Nam 57%.
Break Points Saved %: Song 0%, Nam 53%.
E. Song Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-3 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-4 6-3 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 7-6(4) | ||
Q3 | L | 6-3 7-6(1) | ||
Q1 | W | 4-6 7-5 4-3 ret. | ||
J. S. Nam Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-0 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-7(8) 6-4 7-6(6) | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 5-7 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||

E. Song vs J. S. Nam Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51.90% (219/203) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.34% (311/241) |
| 51.70% (487/455) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.80% (698/553) |
| 51.57% (4489/4216) | Games Win/Loss | 52.37% (6070/5520) |
| 54.00% (189/161) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.88% (257/187) |
| 31.43% (11/24) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (28/28) |
| 51.35% (19/18) | Indoor Hard W/L | 51.02% (25/24) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
| 878 | Aces Total | 1047 |
| 0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 425 | Total Double Faults | 982 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 561.94 | Average Opponent Rank | 577.57 |
| 64% (10612/16693) | 1st Serve % | 65% (14629/22558) |
| 67% (7135/10612) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (9882/14629) |
| 50% (3057/6087) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3878/7929) |
| 42% (719/1696) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1184/2688) |
| 40% (6772/16961) | Return Points Win % | 43% (10166/23771) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50.00% (3/3) |
| 50.00% (3/3) | Main Tour W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 46.43% (52/60) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (112/112) |
| 54.30% (164/138) | Futures W/L | 61.71% (195/121) |
| 51% (211/413) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (301/536) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (4/4) |
| 49% (50/103) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (77/144) |
| 47% (48/103) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (74/156) |
| 88% (229/202) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (311/266) |
| 12% (229/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (311/44) |
| 9% (193/17) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (240/45) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Sun, 30 Nov, 05:00 AM
PredictionSun, 30 Nov, 03:00 PM
PredictionSat, 29 Nov, 09:30 PM
PredictionSun, 30 Nov, 06:00 AM
PredictionSat, 29 Nov, 07:05 PM
PredictionSun, 30 Nov, 07:15 AM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

29 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

29 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →James Duckworth vs Dane Sweeny Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Argentina Open – Buenos Aires Preview And Prediction: Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Betting Tips & Picks November 28, 2025
Top Predictions Today
20:05
H2H 0-0
21:30
H2H 0-0
05:30
H2H 0-0
14:00
H2H 0-0
15:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Athens Challenger
Greece
Bogota Challenger
Colombia
Islamabad Challenger
Pakistan
Maia Challenger
Portugal
Manama 2 Challenger
Bahrain
Playford Challenger
Australia
Temuco Challenger
Chile
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Gwalior
India
M15 Phan Thiet
Vietnam
M15 Santiago
Chile
M25 Bhopal
India